<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Activity for Precision Time Protocol daemon</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/activity/</link><description>Recent activity for Precision Time Protocol daemon</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:15:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Tim Nguyen posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/d228becda0/?limit=25#bb77</link><description>hi, Can we create multiple PTP masters on 1 physical Ethernet port using virtual IP addresses? if it is a yes, how many IP addresses ptp4l can support on that port? thanks, Tim N.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Nguyen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:15:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/d228becda0/?limit=25#bb77</guid></item><item><title>Tim Nguyen posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/20535e9e71/?limit=25#dac6</link><description>I'd like to know the road map for option features of IEEE1588-2019 implementation in linuxptp project (ptp4l)? especially unicast and multicast mixed mode and authentication TLV. thanks, Tim Nguyen</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Nguyen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 15:32:46 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/20535e9e71/?limit=25#dac6</guid></item><item><title>Ahmad Shnewer posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/2ca66f920b/?limit=25#b7d7</link><description>I am trying to run ptpd on ESXi Hypervisor and I cant get it to work properly, When I run the ptp service it keeps resetting: tail -f /var/run/log/ptpd.stats # Timestamp, State, Clock ID, One Way Delay, Offset From Master, Slave to Master, Master to Slave, Observed Drift, Last packet Received, Sequence ID, One Way Delay Mean, One Way Delay Std Dev, Offset From Master Mean, Offset From Master Std Dev, Observed Drift Mean, Observed Drift Std Dev, raw delayMS, raw delaySM 2021-01-19 08:15:09.948735,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ahmad Shnewer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:36:15 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/2ca66f920b/?limit=25#b7d7</guid></item><item><title>Andrea Migliaccio posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/cfbf0e4cba/?limit=25#fb17</link><description>Is it possibile to configure PTPd for Power Profile?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea Migliaccio</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:27:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/cfbf0e4cba/?limit=25#fb17</guid></item><item><title>Alex  posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/03c13d55ba/?limit=25#4265</link><description>I am trying to run ptpd with multiple slaves, but I cannot figure out how to achieve it. in my /etc/default/ptpd file I currently have "PTPD_OPTS="-M -i ens10f0" If I try to add one more interface here "PTPD_OPTS="-M -i ens10f0 ens10f1" it does not work. I tried launching ptpd twice with single interface, but does not work. I am using ubuntu 18.04.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:42:32 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/03c13d55ba/?limit=25#4265</guid></item><item><title>Eddie Tseng posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/769adbe92f/?limit=25#c793</link><description>Hi, I'm using Ubuntu 18.04. I git cloned the latest ptpd (2.3.1) and tried to install the package, when I ran "make install", errors occurred. It looks like I got permission denied. tseng@machine-pc:~/ptpd$ make install make install-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/home/tseng/ptpd' Making install in src make[2]: Entering directory '/home/tseng/ptpd/src' make[3]: Entering directory '/home/tseng/ptpd/src' /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/sbin' /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eddie Tseng</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:59:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/769adbe92f/?limit=25#c793</guid></item><item><title>Robert McMahon posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7/ce5e</link><description>I installed another GPS OCXO then used iperf multicast to measure one-way delay. It seems good suggesting this isn't a network issue. These are fedora 30 machines. uname -r gives 5.3.16-200.fc30.x86_64 [rjmcmahon@localhost iperf2-code]$ src/iperf -s -u -B 224.0.1.129 -e -i 10 ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on UDP port 5001 with pid 16757 Joining multicast group 224.0.1.129 Receiving 1470 byte datagrams UDP buffer size: 208 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert McMahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 05:07:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7/ce5e</guid></item><item><title>Robert McMahon modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</link><description>I'm running PTP master with a GPS disciplined OCXO. The PTP slave isn't converging as expected. They are directly connected over a 10G link. Snippit from ptpd stats where time 2020-01-07 01:13:30.760854 is suspicous The IBM article here that describes the fields suggests a huge increase in one-way delay. Not sure why this would occur. Is there a realtime sheduler mode or other suggested techniques for PTP to optimize this? I did configure CPU affinity. Maybe I should remove it. 2020-01-07 01:13:19.476933,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert McMahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:51:42 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</guid></item><item><title>Robert McMahon modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</link><description>I'm running PTP master with a GPS disciplined OCXO. The PTP slave isn't converging as expected. They are directly connected over a 10G link. Snippit from ptpd stats where time 2020-01-07 01:13:30.760854 is suspicous The IBM article here that describes the fields suggests a huge increase in one-way delay. Not sure why this would occur. Is there a realtime sheduler mode for PTP? 2020-01-07 01:13:19.476933, slv, 001132fffebeba60(unknown)/1, 0.000150639, 0.001595407, -0.001539000, 0.001714000, -136419.636000000,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert McMahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 21:37:26 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</guid></item><item><title>Robert McMahon posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</link><description>I'm running PTP master with a GPS disciplined OCXO. The PTP slave isn't converging as expected. They are directly connected over a 10G link. Snippit from ptpd stats where time 2020-01-07 01:13:30.760854 is suspicous 2020-01-07 01:13:19.476933, slv, 001132fffebeba60(unknown)/1, 0.000150639, 0.001595407, -0.001539000, 0.001714000, -136419.636000000, D, 00446, 0.000153913, 1222, 0.001781808, 100341, -145760, 5341, 0.001714000, -0.001539000 2020-01-07 01:13:19.680866, slv, 001132fffebeba60(unknown)/1,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert McMahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:18:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/fbf101a2e8/?limit=25#20f7</guid></item><item><title>Guilherme Costa G Fernandes posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7cc2a8e1/?limit=25#9c9e</link><description>Hi all, I'm having this same issue: the clocks take a long time (in the order of ten minutes) to synchronize when starting with an offset in the order of 100 ms. I'm running a system that cannot be kept powered up between uses. I see that some features @wowczarek mentioned, such as preserving the kernel frequency, have been implement in the newest version. However, I'm interested in what @Jan Breuer mentioned: how to lower the threshold for stepping the clock from 1 second to 10 ms, for example?...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guilherme Costa G Fernandes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:01:14 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7cc2a8e1/?limit=25#9c9e</guid></item><item><title>Thomas F. posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#d640</link><description>It seems to be a problem with a wrong interrupt vector number in the function getTime(). Does someone know, why the getTime() function is based on an interrupt for QNX Neutrino systems and interrupt-les for all other systems?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:49:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#d640</guid></item><item><title>Thomas F. posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#ae11</link><description>The same behavior occurs also when only using ptpd (as master and slave). MASTER: #~/00_TEMP/ptpd$ sudo src/ptpd2 -i vlan1234 -d 0 -M -E -C --ptpengine:transport=ethernet --ptpengine:dot1as=1 --ptpengine:disable_bmca=1 2019-09-18 15:04:51.369795 ptpd2[9318].startup (notice) (___) PTPd version 2.3.2 starting 2019-09-18 15:04:51.369829 ptpd2[9318].startup (info) (___) Starting ptpd2 daemon with parameters: src/ptpd2 -i vlan1234 -d 0 -M -E -C 2019-09-18 15:04:51.369843 ptpd2[9318].startup (info) (___)...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:16:49 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#ae11</guid></item><item><title>Thomas F. modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#13b1</link><description>Hello, The time master was a Linux system with PTP4L started as: ptp4l -i eth0.1234 -S -E -2 -m -q The ptpd client was started as: ptpd2 -i vlan1234 -s -E -C -L --ptpengine:transport="ethernet" --ptpengine:use_libpcap="Y" The output I get from ptpd client is the following: 2020-01-01 00:04:24.297000 ptpd2[852006].vlan1234 (notice) (lstn_init) Now in state: PTP_LISTENING 2020-01-01 00:04:26.266000 ptpd2[852006].vlan1234 (info) (lstn_init) New best master selected: b827ebfffe009301(unknown)/1 2020-01-01...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:02:07 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#13b1</guid></item><item><title>Thomas F. posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#13b1</link><description>Hello, The time master was a Linux system with PTP4L started as: ptp4l -i eth0.1234 -S -E -2 -m -q The ptpd client was started as: ptpd2 -i vlan1234 -s -E -C -L --ptpengine:transport="ethernet" --ptpengine:use_libpcap="Y" The output I get from ptpd client is the following: 2020-01-01 00:04:24.297000 ptpd2[852006].vlan1234 (notice) (lstn_init) Now in state: PTP_LISTENING 2020-01-01 00:04:26.266000 ptpd2[852006].vlan1234 (info) (lstn_init) New best master selected: b827ebfffe009301(unknown)/1 2020-01-01...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas F.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 10:38:23 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/46d413e71d/?limit=25#13b1</guid></item><item><title>saspace posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/0903112679/?limit=25#8e11</link><description>Hello, Does anyone has idea on how to test this in a linux server configured as a PTP master to send Leap second to test how the PTP slaves handle the leap second ? Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saspace</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 19:20:10 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/0903112679/?limit=25#8e11</guid></item><item><title>saspace posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/0903112679/?limit=25#7337</link><description>Hello, I have a PTP master (not a real Grand Master, rather ptp daemon in a linux server is configured as free running PTP master) which is sending time downstream to several PTP slaves. I would like to do a leap second testing by sending fake leap second announce message and insertion from the PTP master. This is to test if the clients handled leap second correctly or not. I see there is a method for NTP (although I have not tested that) and the method is ... wget ftp://nist...../leap-seconds.list...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saspace</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 19:20:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/0903112679/?limit=25#7337</guid></item><item><title>saspace posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5cc7600ed6/?limit=25#e771</link><description>Hello, Does anyone has idea on how to test this in a linux server configured as a PTP master to send Leap second to test how the PTP slaves handle the leap second ? Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saspace</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:48:09 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5cc7600ed6/?limit=25#e771</guid></item><item><title>saspace posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5cc7600ed6/?limit=25#89f2</link><description>Hello, I have a PTP master (not a real Grand Master, rather ptp daemon in a linux server is configured as free running PTP master) which is sending time downstream to several PTP slaves. I would like to do a leap second testing by sending fake leap second announce message and insertion from the PTP master. This is to test if the clients handled leap second correctly or not. I see there is a method for NTP (although I have not tested that) and the method is ... wget ftp://nist...../leap-seconds.list...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saspace</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:35:56 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5cc7600ed6/?limit=25#89f2</guid></item><item><title>Andrew Thomson posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dcf6e30793/?limit=25#e9f0</link><description>Hi, I'm noticing this happens on a number of hosts, seemingly randomly, all Ubuntu 18.04. Running this package: ptpd 2.3.1-debian1-3 amd64 Ptpd stops updating it's status file: pub03:~# ls -l /var/run/ptpd.status -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1362 Jul 3 17:45 /var/run/ptpd.status pub03:~# date Wed Jul 3 20:35:01 CDT 2019 I also observe higher CPU usage, and an strace seems to indicate some kind of continuous loop?? --- SIGALRM {si_signo=SIGALRM, si_code=SI_TIMER, si_timerid=0x1, si_overrun=47, si_value={int=-1710448416,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Thomson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 01:40:25 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dcf6e30793/?limit=25#e9f0</guid></item><item><title>Eric Bonjour posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#0751</link><description>Shortly after my last post I found: ; Timestamp format used when logging timing statistics ; (when global:log_statistics is enabled): ; datetime - formatttted date and time: YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss.uuuuuu ; unix - Unix timestamp with nanoseconds: s.ns ; both - Formatted date and time, followed by unix timestamp ; (adds one extra field to the log) ; ; Options: datetime unix both Changing to global:statistics_timestamp_format = unix results in no CRLF issues, try it on your side. Changing to global:statistics_timestamp_format...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Bonjour</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 20:21:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#0751</guid></item><item><title>Eric Bonjour posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#3dd2</link><description>Have the same issues with CRLF. Running on CentOS 7.3. Were you able to find any configuration values that help mitigate the bug Jack?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Bonjour</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 20:02:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#3dd2</guid></item><item><title>Redd posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/4febabdec9/?limit=25#ab8a</link><description>What is the ideal time difference between slave servers using PTP?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Redd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:23:12 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/4febabdec9/?limit=25#ab8a</guid></item><item><title>Jack Winch (RR) posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#9733</link><description>Hi folks, I'm currently running ptpd2 version 2.3.1 on Raspbian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) and have only made the following changes to the standard ptd2.conf file (the rest of the config remains un-changed and in its default state post-install) in order to enable the logging of stats. global:statistics_file = /var/log/ptpd2-stats.log global:statistics_log_interval = 1 global:statistics_file_max_size = 100 I can produce more of the config. file (and any other details) upon request. The statistics file...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Winch (RR)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 17:27:49 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/f7d5388232/?limit=25#9733</guid></item><item><title>Andreas posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/6bbd380a8a/?limit=25#5027</link><description>I am running two unicast slaves with signaling. I am not able to stop slaves from communicating with master. Can someone help me?. What is command, or procedure, to stop slaves?. Many thanks in advance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andreas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 13:14:44 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/6bbd380a8a/?limit=25#5027</guid></item><item><title>Phillip Marks posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/3c073500/?limit=25#ff92</link><description>I'd like to compile ptpd for QNX 6.4.1. Is such an old version still supported? We'd like to achieve 500us accuracy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Marks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:16:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/3c073500/?limit=25#ff92</guid></item><item><title>Waleed posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/e275f10a/?limit=25#2563</link><description>Hi everyone, I am wondering if there is way to reduce offset calclation to be one offset value per second. I excuted the following command : sudo ptpd -i eth0 -P -C -V -s and I usualy get these results: 2018-07-27 17:42:44.151679, slv, 20b7c0fffe0069fe(unknown)/01, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 500000.000000000, I 1532711360.662651146 2018-07-27 17:42:45.145442, slv, 20b7c0fffe0069fe(unknown)/01, 0.000000000, 0.267342695, 0.000000000, 0.534685390, 500000.000000000, S 1532711360.665130409...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Waleed</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:12:27 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/e275f10a/?limit=25#2563</guid></item><item><title>Chander Panwar posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/c5ecbe45/?limit=25#faa7</link><description>Hi All I have a query related to PTP setup. We have PTP running to sync time in multiple servers and designed topology is like the PTP master clock (It sync with GM on same location) runs on one location (Say A location) and the slaves clock is in other location (Say B location) and both the locations are connected in the network. We use ptpd utility in ubuntu OS server boxes and PTPD version 2.2 for server and PTPD version 2.3.1 for client. Now the plan is to introduce another PTP master for time...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chander Panwar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:21:43 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/c5ecbe45/?limit=25#faa7</guid></item><item><title>akash osekar posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/5f1947ce/?limit=25#ec00</link><description>Hi, I am testing PTPdaemon code with version 2.3.2 on a customized embedded hardware. I'm testing multicast receive here. Please correct me if I'm wrong in understanding, as per my current observation netSelect is a function which polls for packet receive and returns positive number if packets are received. here the timeout parameter is sent as 0. Here if I test unicast receive then it is working fine, but multicast packets are not being received. Can anybody help me to understand this behavior?...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">akash osekar</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 14:43:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/5f1947ce/?limit=25#ec00</guid></item><item><title>Jeremy Friesner posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/214ddd3a/?limit=25#b48a</link><description>Hi all, I was able to build ptpd from the wowczarek-2.3.2-libcck fork/branch and get it to synchronize clocks while in IPv6/masterslave mode on a couple of Debian machines. It seems to work well. My question involves failover -- these machines each have two independent Ethernet ports, and sometimes they are configured with network redundancy, such that each Ethernet port is connected to a different Ethernet switch. The goal is that if one of the two Ethernet switches dies, the system can continue...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Friesner</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:23:57 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/214ddd3a/?limit=25#b48a</guid></item><item><title>Andy W. Clements posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#c578</link><description>Thanks Wojciech. I will give this a shot. You folks do good work. Thanks for all your efforts!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy W. Clements</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 16:06:44 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#c578</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#0606</link><description>Hi - this was identified some time ago. PTPd is not maintained on SF anymore, pull the latest github source from https://github.com/ptpd/ptpd and you should not have this issue anymore. Thanks, Wojciech</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 10:33:41 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#0606</guid></item><item><title>Andy W. Clements posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#386b</link><description>I have a couple of x86_64 machines running CentOS 7 and ptpd2: &gt; uname -a Linux &lt;machinename&gt; 3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 4 01:06:37 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux &gt;ptpd2 -v ptpd2 version 2.3.1-rc3 After running for a day or two, the ptpd2 instance start pegging the CPU at about 100%. Via top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1580 root 20 0 14016 1052 820 R 100.0 0.0 60:02.27 ptpd2 Restarting them will have them go back to normal( &lt; 1% CPU usage). Not sure...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy W. Clements</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:53:02 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/38bd8ec0/?limit=25#386b</guid></item><item><title>Evan Daykin posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/cbab7270/?limit=25#a948</link><description>Hello all, I have two VLANs I would like to limit traffic between. VLAN A has a high-precision grandmaster clock, and I would like to open a Unicast channel to transmit synchronization information to a second clock on VLAN B. these masters would also multicast to slaves in their respective networks. Does anyone know if or how this is possible?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Daykin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:55:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/cbab7270/?limit=25#a948</guid></item><item><title>Andrew Wilson posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5caafbd7/?limit=25#54c2</link><description>GOt this resolved,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:49:39 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5caafbd7/?limit=25#54c2</guid></item><item><title>Andrew Wilson posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5caafbd7/?limit=25#2f02</link><description>Hi Gents, I have recently acquired a Microsemi IGM-1100i Grandmaster. Unlike my old grandmaster, a TM2000A, this one isn't plug and play and being new to PTP I'm kinda lost. Per the user manual from the manufacturer my config is as follows: PTP MASTER CONFIGURATION WITH PROFILE Default: PTP State : enable PTP Max Number Clients : 4 PTP TTL : 20 PTP DSCP : 25 PTP Dither : enable PTP Two Steps : enable PTP Announce Limit : 2 PTP Sync Limit : -6 PTP Delay Limit : -2 PTP Priority 1 : 200 PTP Priority...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:26:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/5caafbd7/?limit=25#2f02</guid></item><item><title>shandiv posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dc08e66d/?limit=25#cac3</link><description>We installed ptpd-2.3.1-1.el6.x86_64 in our environment and we are noticing 99-100% CPU utilization(in one core (logical core3/4/5) on few hosts, though below config is set. global:cpuaffinity_cpucore=0 i have below questions: why does ptpd takes 100% cpu in some hosts why does ptp is utilizing other core though config is set to use core0</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shandiv</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:57:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dc08e66d/?limit=25#cac3</guid></item><item><title>Shreyas A modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/69287396/?limit=25#9464</link><description>Hi All, I am trying to configure the PTPd on QNX 7.0 (command line interface). I have used the ptpd open source source code and was able to modify configuration file there, but in QNX I am not sure where this file is located or how to modify it. I am a beginner and any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shreyas</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shreyas A</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:35:27 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/69287396/?limit=25#9464</guid></item><item><title>Shreyas A posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/69287396/?limit=25#9464</link><description>Hi All, I am trying to configure the PTPd on QNX 7.0. I have used the ptpd open source source code and was able to modify configuration file there, but in QNX I am not sure where this file is located or how to modify it. I am a beginner and any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shreyas</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shreyas A</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:33:04 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/69287396/?limit=25#9464</guid></item><item><title>GreyGnome posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8f50ca68/?limit=25#3370</link><description>Hello, I am wondering how I can tell if my PTP infrastructure is healthy or not. From time to time, our /var/run/ptpd2.status file will show "not calibrated, in control" for the "Clock status" entry. I assume that's not good, and "calibrated, in control" is what we want. The /var/log/ptpd2.stats file shows that Sync messages are coming in regularly at 1.1-1.6 second intervals. The Delay Response messages are more irregular, sometimes coming in bunches, and anywhere from 0.006 to 1.9 seconds apart....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GreyGnome</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:30:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8f50ca68/?limit=25#3370</guid></item><item><title>Manu Thakur modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/9feaf3d0/?limit=25#6264</link><description/><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manu Thakur</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:41:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/9feaf3d0/?limit=25#6264</guid></item><item><title>Manu Thakur modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#681d</link><description/><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manu Thakur</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:38:49 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#681d</guid></item><item><title>Manu Thakur posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#681d</link><description>Hi Doug, what command for 8265.1 master you used. I am also trying to enable masteronly mode but failed. i am runing on 2.3.1.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manu Thakur</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:50:37 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#681d</guid></item><item><title>Manu Thakur posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/9feaf3d0/?limit=25#6264</link><description>I am trying to enable masteronly using below config but failed. vi test/client.conf ptpengine:preset=masteronly ptpengine:interface=enp0s3 ptpengine:domain=4 ptpengine:ip_mode=unicast ptpengine:unicast_negotiation=Y ptpengine:unicast_destinations=10.60.129.107 ptpengine:disable_bmca=y ptpengine:log_delayreq_interval = 0 ptpengine:clock_class = 13 ptpengine:ptp_clock_accuracy = ACC_100NS ptpengine:utc_offset_valid = N ptpengine:time_traceable = Y ptpengine:frequency_traceable = Y global:periodic_updates=y...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manu Thakur</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 13:43:55 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/9feaf3d0/?limit=25#6264</guid></item><item><title>Anup Gangwar posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296/2411/1105</link><description>Hi Lin, I see a GitHub project for PTPD: https://github.com/ptpd/ptpd. Not sure if this is the one most commonly used in distributions. Thanks, Anup On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:27 PM, linchen linchen1981@users.sf.net wrote: Hi Anu, could you please point the github project? do you mean "git clone git:// git.code.sf.net/p/linuxptp/code linuxptp" ? this is totally different with ptpd. thanks, Lin How to get support in PTPD for specific vendor's chip https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296/2411...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anup Gangwar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:26:05 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296/2411/1105</guid></item><item><title>linchen posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296/2411</link><description>Hi Anu, could you please point the github project? do you mean "git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/linuxptp/code linuxptp" ? this is totally different with ptpd. thanks, Lin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">linchen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:57:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296/2411</guid></item><item><title>Anup Gangwar posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296</link><description>Hi Lin, There is a github project for it (which perhaps you are already aware of), you could directly commit your code there/submit patches. However, for my work done long back, the chip-support for limited to Linux. Thanks, Anup On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:35 PM, linchen linchen1981@users.sf.net wrote: Hi Anup, thanks for your reply. yes, we have a plan to submit the patch to kernel. and also we want to do some changes for PTPD, how could we submit the patch for PTPD for the new chip support? I am...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anup Gangwar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:18:32 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba/9296</guid></item><item><title>linchen posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba</link><description>Hi Anup, thanks for your reply. yes, we have a plan to submit the patch to kernel. and also we want to do some changes for PTPD, how could we submit the patch for PTPD for the new chip support? I am in Qualcomm, do you know anyone in qualcomm is also the PTP mail list? In this case I can communicate with him directly. thanks, Lin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">linchen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:05:57 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9/5fba</guid></item><item><title>Anup Gangwar posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9</link><description>Hi Lin, Please see the changes for Freescale 8315 (if I am not wrong) chip and you can make similar changes for the other chip. You will need to submit patches directly to the Kernel mailing list. Thanks, Anup On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:34 PM, linchen linchen1981@users.sf.net wrote: Hi All, This is Lin, there is a chip supporting ptp feature in my company, and i am working on the ptp drivers for it. do you have any guide about how to support the chip by PTPD and how to upstream the codes? thanks,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anup Gangwar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 05:34:16 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9/a5a9</guid></item><item><title>linchen posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9</link><description>Hi All, This is Lin, there is a chip supporting ptp feature in my company, and i am working on the ptp drivers for it. do you have any guide about how to support the chip by PTPD and how to upstream the codes? thanks, Lin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">linchen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:04:45 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/001df566/?limit=25#47f9</guid></item><item><title>Robert McMahon posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/974d9be5/?limit=25#c0de</link><description>Hi, I'm seeing "No active masters present, Ressting port" on all my slaves which is causing a hiccup in the clocks. This is version 3.2.1 running on Fedora 23 (master) and Fedora 25 (slaves.) It's configured to use ip multicast. The periodic timing of this exactly correlates with the connecting ethernet switch's IGMP snooping timer. Any ideas? 2017-11-16 07:16:32.479024 ptpd2[1396].enp3s0 (notice) (lstn_reset) Now in state: PTP_LISTENING 2017-11-16 07:16:34.378853 ptpd2[1396].enp3s0 (notice) (slv)...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert McMahon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:50:32 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/974d9be5/?limit=25#c0de</guid></item><item><title>Fiti modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</link><description/><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fiti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:47:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</guid></item><item><title>Ivan Johansen posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/b5689fe0/?limit=25#7780</link><description>I don't want ptpd to set the system clock, so I am running ptpd with -n. Instead I want to retrieve the PTP clock from an application. Any suggestion how I do that? Is there an API I can call from my application?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ivan Johansen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:42:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/b5689fe0/?limit=25#7780</guid></item><item><title>Sam Chang posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#2634</link><description>Doug Braden, I use unicast mode in my slave and add unicast_addres=master address in conf. it work for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Chang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:01:52 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#2634</guid></item><item><title>Ron Ziv posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/bb47811b/?limit=25#8dcb</link><description>Hi, I wish to use ptpd via vlan, from my understanding it should work "out of the box", I am running it on ubuntu server 16.04 and configured vlan via "vconfig". When I try to communicate the vlan from 2 instances of the ptpd (on different guests of same host machine and of course different networks cards) it seems to works fine. Yet, I have an embedded dedicated ptp machine that implements the protocol and when I try to communicate with it with vlan something odd happens, the first message that...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ron Ziv</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:48:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/bb47811b/?limit=25#8dcb</guid></item><item><title>Sam Chang posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#e1f4</link><description>I have the same problem, I used wireshark to capture packet, but I didn't capture any request from slave.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Chang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:27:37 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#e1f4</guid></item><item><title>Doug Braden posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#3f9f</link><description>I'm new to ptpd, but believe I have it configured correctly to act as a slave to a separate hardware master on my network. The master is configured to use 8265.1 and sees a slave connect when I start ptpd with the following options: ptpd2 -C -s -i enp3s0 -U -u xxx.xxx.xxx.91 -g -d 4 -r -4 where .91 is the master clocks IP address. The ptpd status file shows: 2017-09-12 08:48:46.054360, lstn_reset, 194 2017-09-12 08:48:47.058189, slv, 0020d2fffecd0642(unknown)/2, 0.000000000, 0.000000000, 0.000000000,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Braden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:08:17 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/56dbbad2/?limit=25#3f9f</guid></item><item><title>Simon Barrett posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/523c4e23/?limit=25#fadc</link><description>Was there a fix for this? I'm seeing the same issue on CentOS 6.8 with ptpd2 version 2.3.1 Sep 7 09:51:52 server kernel: ptpd2[171046]: segfault at 7f1cfd2c3000 ip 00000039f1489af7 sp 00007fff1e7f9148 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[39f1400000+18a000] Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Barrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 09:45:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/523c4e23/?limit=25#fadc</guid></item><item><title>Waleed posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/4a52fbac/?limit=25#a53c</link><description>Hello, I am beginner in ptpd and raspberry pi and I installed ptpd by using the following commands: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install ptpd but when I checked the version I found it 2.3.0. How can I upgrade it to 2.3.1 I need that version because I have the same version on Fedora and I want to make comparsion between the output using the same version of ptpd Does anybody know how can I make it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Waleed</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:12:32 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/4a52fbac/?limit=25#a53c</guid></item><item><title>A Jones posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#63b7</link><description>Hi Wojciech, Quick update. I have your branch of PTPd working on the Altera Cyclone V SoC. This infers (implies?) that PTPd should work on the Altera Arria V SoC, too, as both of these products use the eMAC licensed from ST Microelectronics. Thanks again for all your help! -Allan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 22:49:18 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#63b7</guid></item><item><title>Abir Ouni posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#f5ff</link><description>Hi ! i want to implement the necessary timer component depending on FreeRTOS. My question is whether i should implement new timer_interface.c instead of ( eventtimer_posix.c, eventtimer_itimer.c ) and keep the (ptp_timers, eventtimer.c) unmodified or modify the ptp_timers.c depending on FreeRTOS. your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanx abir</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abir Ouni</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:32:23 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#f5ff</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#19df</link><description>Allan, OK - that would explain the reported empty messages received - as per the comment in the sources "mesage without a timestamp considered harmful". This is likely a driver issue. While for TX timestamps, PTPd has its own way of dealing with waiting for them - for RX timestamps it follows the API and does nothing special. Thanks, Wojciech</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:22:06 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#19df</guid></item><item><title>A Jones posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#2bd9</link><description>Hi Wojciech, I really appreciate the work you've done on implementing H/W timestamping -- Very nice! A little more about this environment: The Cyclone V SoC uses the ST Microelectronics EMAC, and the O/S I'm using is a Linux 4.10 kernel -- I'm not seeing txTimestampErrors as much as I'm seeing rxTimestampErrors errors: ~~~ 2017-06-29 22:31:58.763006 ptpd[558].(info) transport: ======= transport 'Event' error counters ====== 2017-06-29 22:31:58.763155 ptpd[558].(info) transport: rxErrors: 0 2017-06-29...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:52:44 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#2bd9</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#244c</link><description>Hi there, What you are seeing is actually a "side effect" of the driver / OS not being able to capture the transmission timestamps of the delay request messages. This is a notorious problem with many cards and drivers, almost to be expected. Ptpd silently ignores this, but as a result you have sequence gaps, because the transmitted delayResp - which is physically transmitted - is considered not sent, and the response comes back, but is dropped. I think I will need to rework this, because this behaviour...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:20:07 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#244c</guid></item><item><title>A Jones posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#8da4</link><description>Hi! The Altera Cyclone V Soc has IEEE1588-2008 support in the MAC hardware. I have the 'wowczarek-2.3.2-libcck' branch working, mostly. The problem is, is that the sequence-numbers will occasionally get out of sync -- I'm including a snippet of the log-file that indicates this: 2017-06-29 20:58:05.189102 ptpd[558].(debug1) Received an empty PTP message (this should not happen) - ignoring 2017-06-29 20:58:05.189197 ptpd[558].(debug1) ==&gt; DelayResp message received, sequence 36414 2017-06-29 20:58:05.189241...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:24:53 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/461054f4/?limit=25#8da4</guid></item><item><title>jessica davidson posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dc08e66d/?limit=25#1c31</link><description>Whenever I tried to play any game on my pc, I was facing the same high CPU usage problem. Searched a lot and found that problem may be cause by svchost.exe (netsvcs)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessica davidson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 05:51:26 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/dc08e66d/?limit=25#1c31</guid></item><item><title>yangjie posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/6b7d126c/?limit=25#35c9</link><description>i wanted to ues ptpd in WLAN with one master and many slaves. slaves know master ip addr, but master do not know slave, so I uesd negotiation . E2E negotiation is ok, but P2P i can not configure well。 is master need two ptpd process in p2p mode？ can recommend a suitable configuration for me? thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yangjie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 01:52:17 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/6b7d126c/?limit=25#35c9</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#aea9</link><description>Hi, The truth is that it doesn't really matter, because the slaves also run the BMCA, so even if two masters become active, slaves will select only one anyway. When the active master goes away, the other two will wait n * announce interval (configurable) and will consider themselves best and will start transmitting, possibly both. But soon after the "worse" of the two receives the first announce message from the "better" one, it will stop being master. Actually not as soon as, but soon.How long this...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:50:52 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#aea9</guid></item><item><title>Jack Jones modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#2869</link><description>Hi everybody. I have a question considering BMC algorithm in PTP. For example, if I have 3 nodes, in normal case, one node is grandmaster to other 2 nodes (grandmaster is connected with second node and second node is connected with third node) . But if I restart grandmaster node, is it possible that both of other two nodes become master? If it is possible, can you please explain how? Shouldn't BMC algorithm choose better from those two as master? Thanks in advance</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:17:39 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#2869</guid></item><item><title>Jack Jones posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#2869</link><description>Hi everybody. I have a question considering BMC algorithm in PTP. For example, if I have 3 nodes. In normal case, one node is grandmaster to other 2 nodes. But if I restart grandmaster node, is it possible that both of other two nodes become master? If it is possible, can you please explain how? Shouldn't BMC algorithm choose better from those two as master? Thanks in advance</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Jones</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:51:36 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/be86eec2/?limit=25#2869</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/625f7287/?limit=25#5d4f</link><description>Hi, Anyone knows where i can define my .conf file to when ptpd2 starts init with my .conf? I'm using buildroot, Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:55:59 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/625f7287/?limit=25#5d4f</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#e44b</link><description>Now works. just doned: echo 10 &gt;/proc/sys/net/ipv4/igmp_max_memberships But where i can define my .conf file to when ptpd2 starts init with my .conf? Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:14:54 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#e44b</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#bc01</link><description>I've got these errors too: // # ptpd2 -C -m -i eth0 2017-04-20 15:37:02.660701 ptpd2[233].startup (info) () Configuration OK 2017-04-20 15:37:02.660827 ptpd2[233].startup (info) () Successfully acquired lock on /var/run/ptpd2.lock 2017-04-20 15:37:02.660883 ptpd2[233].startup (notice) () PTPDv2 started successfully on eth0 using "masterslave" preset (PID 233) 2017-04-20 15:37:02.660897 ptpd2[233].startup (info) () TimingService.PTP0: PTP service init 2017-04-20 15:37:02.661040 ptpd2[233].eth0 (error)...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:37:14 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#bc01</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</link><description>Probably i have the ptpd.conf by default (and my eth0 is not defined) so gives me the error i described, im reading this: Anyone know where i can define the config file? im using buildroot and this way: https://gist.github.com/mhaberler/f4809ed2e465912d3534 it should work for ptpd2 or only for ptpd? shoud i rename the file for etc/default/ptpd2 instead of etc/default/ptpd ? Regards,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:19:50 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</link><description>Anyone know where i can define the config file im using buildroot and this way: https://gist.github.com/mhaberler/f4809ed2e465912d3534 it should work for ptpd2 or only for ptpd? shoud i rename the file for etc/default/ptpd2 instead of etc/default/ptpd ? Regards,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:39:22 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</link><description>Anyone know where i can define the config file im using buildroot and this way: https://gist.github.com/mhaberler/f4809ed2e465912d3534 it should work for ptpd2 or only for ptpd? Regards,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:36:19 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#551f</guid></item><item><title>Jose Manuel posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#1d11</link><description>Hi Folks, i'm using ptpd2 v2.3.1 and can synchronize clocks between my Vmware and my slave in Unicast. When i try multicast gives me that error: (init) failed to join the multicast group (strerror: No such file or directory) Im using an custom kernel version 4.11.0-rc5. I thhink probably the problem is this erros in my logging dmesg: " Starting ptpd2: random: crng init done Configuration error: option "ptpengine:interface" is required Warning: Unicast negotiation can only be used with unicast transmission...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jose Manuel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:47:27 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/7d148a71/?limit=25#1d11</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/1a16d121/?limit=25#cb11</link><description>Hi, I am not sure what this question has to do with PTPd. Were you meant to post it somewhere else? Thanks, Wojciech</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:30:29 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/1a16d121/?limit=25#cb11</guid></item><item><title>abbey seraph posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/1a16d121/?limit=25#ed17</link><description>Hi, I am really very new to RTAI and RTnet I am trying to install RTnet, but I am...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">abbey seraph</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:25:06 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/1a16d121/?limit=25#ed17</guid></item><item><title>abbey seraph modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/f3aae10f/?limit=25#98d1</link><description/><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">abbey seraph</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:24:28 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/f3aae10f/?limit=25#98d1</guid></item><item><title>abbey seraph posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/f3aae10f/?limit=25#98d1</link><description>Hi, I am really very new to RTAI and RTnet I am trying to install RTnet, but I am...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">abbey seraph</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:23:25 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469207/thread/f3aae10f/?limit=25#98d1</guid></item><item><title>Fiti modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</link><description>Hello, I have implemented my own hardware clock and PHC API. It works perfectly,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fiti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:45:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</guid></item><item><title>Fiti posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</link><description>Hello, I have implemented my own hardware clock and PHC API. It works perfectly,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fiti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:41:11 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/8d2e0580/?limit=25#3112</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#6768</link><description>Hi Wojciech, I am using the latest Mellanox OFED drivers. Hopefully that is ok. Anyway,...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:49:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#6768</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#9ace</link><description>Hi - can you stop the NTP client and see if that makes a difference? Also make sure...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:52:35 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#9ace</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#9ace</link><description>Hi - can you stop the NTP client and see if that makes a difference? Also make sure...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:51:40 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#9ace</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d57a</link><description>The stratum 1 NTP server is couple of hops away, but local.. The eno1 clock offset...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:40:16 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d57a</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#8af9</link><description>Hi - the stratum 1 NTP server, is it local or is it somewhere on the Internet? Also...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 21:21:41 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#8af9</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#a876</link><description>Hi Wojciech, As you say, let talk first about the master. I use PTPd setup on a separate...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:54:19 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#a876</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#195d</link><description>Hi - definitely not a problem with your build tools or your OS. I double-checked...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:11:52 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#195d</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#a054</link><description>Hi Wojciech, I am confused. I actually have the latest source. I checked it with...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:40:06 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#a054</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d5b9/d600</link><description>Hi Mircea, This is the correct branch, but there were some updates committed a few...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 22:33:01 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d5b9/d600</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d5b9</link><description>Ok. I was using this branch: https://github.com/wowczarek/ptpd/tree/wowczarek-2.3.2-libcck...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:21:31 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#d5b9</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek modified a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#c1e1</link><description>Hi Mircea, Please update your source. The debug build issue is already fixed. There...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:51:20 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#c1e1</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#c1e1</link><description>Hi Mircea, Please update your source. The debug build issue is already fixed. There...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:50:15 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#c1e1</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#f21d</link><description>Thanks Wojciech. Based on the feedback provided I have made some progress: The master...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:34:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#f21d</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#378a</link><description>Hi - too little information. Are you using the latest source? The current source...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 02:12:22 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#378a</guid></item><item><title>Mircea Orban posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#0627</link><description>I've setup a system that with Mellanox ConnectX-3 Pro nics that support hw timestamps:...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mircea Orban</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 21:19:39 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/91751a6e/?limit=25#0627</guid></item><item><title>Wojciech Owczarek posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#eb07</link><description>There is no guide as such, but you are on the right track. PTPd has moved to Git...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wojciech Owczarek</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:49:47 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#eb07</guid></item><item><title>Abir Ouni posted a comment on discussion Help</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#cecf</link><description>Hello I'm interested in porting PTPd 2.3.1 to an embedded target ( runnig over an...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abir Ouni</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2017 12:31:00 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net/p/ptpd/discussion/469208/thread/986be13d/?limit=25#cecf</guid></item></channel></rss>